A. Understanding
Rule 144A
- What is Rule 144A?
- Who may rely on Rule 144A?
- What are the conditions that a reseller
of restricted securities must satisfy to rely on Rule 144A?
- Must a reseller of restricted securities
rely only on Rule 144A in making exempt resales?
- Are securities resold under Rule 144A freely
tradable after such resale?
- What is the Section 4(1½)
exemption?
B. Eligible Purchasers
- What is a "QIB"?
- How is the value of securities owned and
invested by a QIB calculated under Rule 144A?
- If a company reports both cost and mark-to-market
values of the securities it holds, which values should be
used to determine whether an entity is a QIB?
- Can the amount of securities to be purchased
in a Rule 144A offering be included in calculating the amount
of securities owned or invested by a QIB?
- Will an entity that is formed solely for
the purpose of acquiring restricted securities in a Rule
144A transaction be deemed to be a QIB?
- How does a reseller establish a reasonable
belief that a person is a QIB?
- Can a reseller rely on the information enumerated
in Rule 144A even though more current information shows
that the level of securities owned by the prospective purchaser
is lower?
- Can a reseller of restricted securities
rely on information other than that enumerated in Rule 144A
for its belief that the prospective purchaser is a QIB?
C. Reseller's Reasonable
Steps So Buyer is Aware of Rule 144A Reliance
- Why must the reseller take reasonable steps
to make the purchaser aware that it is relying on Rule 144A
in connection with the resale?
- How does the reseller typically satisfy
the requirement of making the buyer aware that the reseller
may rely on Rule 144A in connection with the resale?
D. Eligible Securities
- When are securities deemed to be of the
"same class" as securities listed on a U.S. national securities
exchange or quoted on an automated inter-dealer quotation
system?
- How is an effective conversion premium calculated?
- Are restricted securities received upon conversion
eligible for resale even though they are the same class
as securities listed on a national securities exchange or
quoted in an automated inter-dealer quotation system?
- Can a reseller rely on Rule 144A to reoffer
or resell securities underlying ADRs?
- What happens if a security that was previously
resold pursuant to Rule 144A is subsequently listed on a
U.S. stock exchange or quoted on a U.S. automated inter-dealer
quotation system?
- What is the definition of U.S. automated
inter-dealer quotation systems for purposes of Rule 144A?
E. Informational
Requirements
- What type of information is required to
be delivered to purchasers under Rule 144A?
- What does "reasonably current" information
mean in connection with furnishing disclosure to purchasers?
- How is the purchaser's "right to obtain"
such information from the issuer enforced?
- What type of information needs to be provided
by a 1934 Act reporting company or a foreign issuer providing
home country information?
- When does the obligation to provide a buyer
with the information cease?
- What information is required to be provided
to a buyer when a Rule 144A issuer's securities are guaranteed
by its parent company?
F. Rule 144A
Trading Markets
- Is there a trading market for Rule 144A
securities?
- Who qualifies as a buyer on the PORTAL market?
- How do securities become eligible to trade
on the PORTAL market?
G. Conducting
Rule 144A Transactions
- How are Rule 144A transactions structured?
- What type of documentation is typically
involved in a Rule 144A transaction?
- What is the offering process in connection
with a Rule 144A transaction?
- Why do Rule 144A purchasers typically insist
that the issuer register the securities issued in the Rule
144A transaction?
- How are Rule 144A securities registered
under the 1933 Act?
- What is an Exxon Capital exchange offering?
- How are Rule 144A securities registered
in a shelf offering?
- Why are shelf offerings not the preferable
form of registering Rule 144A offerings?
- What is a "side-by-side" offering
in the context of Rule 144A?
H. Use of the
Internet to Conduct Rule 144A offerings
- Can the Internet be used to make Rule 144A
reoffers and resales?
I. Miscellaneous
- Are the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws applicable to Rule 144A transactions?
- Is a Rule 144A security a "covered security"
for purposes of Section 18 of the 1933 Act?
- Can an issuer that is not a 1934 Act reporting
company be required to register under the 1934 Act in connection
with a Rule 144A transaction?
- Are securities resold in reliance on Rule
144A included in determining the amount of securities that
a person can resell in reliance on Rule 144?
- May an issuer publish a notice about
a proposed Rule 144A transaction?
Understanding Rule 144A
What is Rule 144A?
A safe harbor exemption from the registration
requirements of Section
5 of the 1933 Act for resales of certain restricted securities
to qualified institutional buyers, who are commonly referred
to as “QIBs.” See more @ “What
is a ‘QIB’?”
In particular, Rule 144A affords safe harbor
treatment for reoffers or resales to QIBs - by persons other
than issuers - of securities of domestic and foreign issuers
that are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange or quoted
on a U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation system. See more
@ “Who may rely on Rule 144A?”
Rule 144A provides that reoffers and resales
in compliance with the rule are not “distributions”
and that the reseller is therefore not an “underwriter”
within the meaning of Section
2(a)(11) of the 1933 Act.
If the reseller is not the issuer or a dealer,
it can rely on the exemption provided by Section
4(1) of the 1933 Act. If the reseller is a dealer, it
can rely on the exemption provided by Section
4(3) of the 1933 Act.
Who may rely
on Rule 144A?
Any person other than an issuer. Affiliates
of the issuer may rely on Rule 144A.
Rule 144A offers no protection for issuers -
they must find another exemption for the offer and sale of
unregistered securities. .
Source: Telephone
Interpretation No. 5 of the March 1999 Supplement of the Division
of Corporation Finance’s Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations.
What are the conditions
that a reseller of restricted securities must satisfy to rely
on Rule 144A?
There are four conditions:
- The reoffer or resale is made only to QIBs
(see more @ what is a "QIB") or to an offeree
or purchaser that the reseller (and any person acting on
its behalf) reasonably believes is a QIB ( see more @ How
does a reseller establish a reasonable belief that a person
is a QIB);
- The reseller (or any person acting on its
behalf) must take reasonable steps to ensure that the buyer
is aware that the reseller may rely on Rule 144A in connection
with such resale (see more @ Reseller’s
Reasonable Steps So Buyer is Aware of Rule 144A Reliance);
- The securities reoffered or resold (a) when
issued were not of the same class as securities listed on
a U.S. national securities exchange or quoted on a U.S.
automated inter-dealer quotation system (see more @
What is the definition of U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation
systems for purposes of Rule 144A?), and (b) are not
securities of an open-end investment company, unit investment
trust, or face-amount certificate company that is, or is
required to be, registered under the Investment Company
Act of 1940; and
- In the case of securities of an issuer that
is neither a 1934 Act reporting company nor exempt from
reporting pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b), the holder and a prospective
buyer designated by the holder must have the right to obtain
from the issuer, upon the holder's request, certain reasonably
current information; and such buyer must receive, upon the
buyer's request of the holder or issuer, certain reasonably
current information about the issuer from the issuer, seller,
or a person acting on behalf of either of them at or prior
to the resale (see more @Informational Requirements).
Source:
Rule
144A(d) of the 1933 Act.
Must a reseller of restricted securities rely only on Rule
144A in making exempt resales?
No, Rule 144A is a non-exclusive safe
harbor.
As a result, a reseller may rely upon any applicable
exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act
in connection with the resale of restricted securities.
Typically, resellers that cannot rely on the
safe harbor under Rule 144A will attempt to rely on the hybrid
Section 4(1½) exemption, which is technically an offering
under Section 4(1) that includes some of the basic features
of a Section 4(2) transaction. See more @ What
is the Section 4 (1½) exemption?.
In addition, resellers of restricted securities
may resell such securities outside of the U.S. under Regulation
S.
Also, if a non-affiliate reseller can satisfy
the one-year holding period requirement of Rule 144(d)(1)
and the other conditions and restrictions imposed by paragraphs
(c), (e), (f) and (h) of Rule 144, it may rely on the resale
safe harbor provided by Rule
144 for the resale of restricted securities. However,
because of the requirement imposed by paragraph (c) of Rule
144, such resales are limited to restricted securities of
issuers that have securities registered pursuant to Section
12 or 15(d) of the 1934 Act.
If the non-affiliate reseller can satisfy the
two-year holding period requirement of Rule 144(k), it may
rely on the resale exemption provided by Rule 144 for the
resale of restricted securities even though the issuer of
the restricted securities does not have securities registered
under the 1934 Act. Moreover, the volume limitations of Rule
144(e), the manner of sale restrictions of Rule 144(f) and
the notice requirement of Rule 144(h) are not applicable to
such resale.
Source: Preliminary
Note No. 2 of Rule 144. With respect to the resale of
restricted securities pursuant to Rule 144, see J. William
Hicks, Resales of Restricted Securities, at 5-3 (West Group
1999) (the non-affiliate that resells restricted securities
pursuant to Rule 144(k) “can treat [as] irrelevant the
fact that the issuer might be private or that material information
concerning it might not be current or publicly available.”).
Are securities
resold under Rule 144A freely tradable after such resale?
No. Securities acquired in a Rule 144A transaction
are deemed to be “restricted securities” within
the meaning of Rule 144(a)(3) of the 1933 Act.
As a result, such securities may only be publicly
resold pursuant to Rule 144 of the 1933 Act or a registration
statement under the 1933 Act.
In addition, such securities may be resold pursuant
to an exemption under the 1933 Act. Exempt resales of restricted
securities may be made in compliance with Rule 144A, the so-called
Section 4(1½) exemption or Regulation S. See more @
What is the Rule 4 (1½) exemption? or Regulation
S
Source: Rule
144(a)(3)(iii) of the 1933 Act and Preliminary
Note No. 6 of Rule 144A of the 1933 Act.
What is the Section
4(1½) exemption?
The Section 4(1½) exemption is
a case law-derived exemption that allows the resale of privately
placed securities in a subsequent private placement.
Technically, it is an offering under Section
4(1) that includes some of the basic features of a Section
4(2) transaction.
The Section 4(1½) exemption typically
is relied on in connection with the resale of restricted securities
to accredited investors who make appropriate representations.
See more @ What are the conditions that a reseller
of restricted securities must satisfy to rely on Rule 144A?
.
Source: The seminal case involving the so-called
Section 4(1½) exemption was the Second Circuit Court
of Appeals decision in Gilligan, Will & Co. v. SEC, 267
F.2d 461 (2d Cir. 1959). The Second Circuit intimated that
a person purchasing restricted securities from an issuer is
not an underwriter for purposes of Section
4(1) of the 1933 Act if the purchaser resells the restricted
securities to persons who qualify as purchasers under Section
4(2) as described by the U.S. Supreme Court in SEC
v. Ralston Purina Co , 346 U.S. 119 (1953), and who acquire
such restricted securities in a private offering of the type
contemplated by Section 4(2).
B. Eligible Purchasers
What is a
"QIB"?
In general, any entity included within
one of the categories of “accredited investor”
defined in Rule
501 of Regulation D of the 1933 Act, acting for its own
account or the accounts of other QIBs, that in the aggregate
owns and invests on a discretionary basis at least $100 million
in securities of issuers not affiliated with the entity ($10
million for a broker-dealer). See more @ Can
the amount of securities to be purchased in a Rule 144A offering
be included in calculating the amount of securities owned
or invested by a QIB? .
Banks and savings and loan associations must
also have a net worth of at least $25 million.
In addition, a broker-dealer acting as a riskless
principal for an identified QIB would itself be deemed a QIB.
To qualify as a riskless principal, the broker-dealer must
have a commitment from the QIB that it will simultaneously
purchase securities from the broker-dealer. The commitment
from the QIB must be effective at the time of purchase in
the Rule 144A transaction.
A QIB can be formed merely for the purpose of
conducting a Rule 144A transaction. See more @
Will an entity that is formed solely for the purpose of acquiring
restricted securities in a Rule 144A transaction be deemed
to be a QIB? .
Source: Rule
144A(a)(1) of the 1933 Act. “The Commission decided
on the $100 million in securities threshold as a presumptive
mechanism - a presumption that the investor has enough experience
to be able to fend for itself in the private resale market
for restricted securities.” J. William Hicks, Resales
of Restricted Securities at 7-34 (West Group 1999).
How is the value of securities owned
and invested by a QIB calculated under Rule 144A?
On a cost basis (i.e., how much the securities
cost when purchased), except that where the entity values
securities on a fair market value basis for financial reporting
purposes and no current information with respect to the cost
of such securities has been published, the entity may use
the fair market value basis for valuation. See more @ If
a company reports both cost and mark-to-market values of the
securities it holds, which values should be used to determine
whether an entity is a QIB?
In determining the amount of securities, an
entity may include securities of its consolidated subsidiaries
if such securities are managed by the entity (a reporting
subsidiary may also include securities of its consolidated
subsidiary if it manages such securities) but must exclude
securities issued or guaranteed by the United States or a
U.S. instrumentality, bank deposit notes and certificates
of deposit, loan participations, repurchase agreements, and
currency, interest rate, and commodity swaps. See more @
Can the amount of securities to be purchased in a Rule 144A
offering be included in calculating the amount of securities
owned or invested by a QIB?.
Source: Rule
144A(a)(2), (3) and (4) of the 1933 Act. For a detailed
discussion of the securities that are included and excluded
for purposes of determining whether a prospective purchaser
is a QIB, see SEC No-Action Letter UNUM Life Insurance Co.
(available November 21, 1990).
If a company reports
both cost and mark-to-market values of the securities it holds,
which values should be used to determine whether an entity
is a QIB?
Only the cost valuation method should
be used.
The SEC staff has made clear its preference
for the use of cost valuation versus market valuation when
determining whether a prospective buyer is a QIB. This applies
regardless of whether the company uses either cost or mark-to-market
financial reporting.
Source: The staff's
views are expressed in SEC No-Action Letter UNUM Life Insurance
Co. (available November 21, 1990).
Can the amount of
securities to be purchased in a Rule 144A offering be included
in calculating the amount of securities owned or invested
by a QIB?
No.
The amount of securities to be purchased
in the Rule 144A transaction itself may not be included when
calculating the amount of securities that are owned or invested
on a discretionary basis by a prospective purchaser for purposes
of determining whether the purchaser is a QIB eligible to
participate in the offering.
Source: Telephone Interpretation No. 6
of the March
1999 Supplement of the Division of Corporation Finance’s
Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations..
Will an entity
that is formed solely for the purpose of acquiring restricted
securities in a Rule 144A transaction be deemed to be a QIB?
Yes.
Eligible purchasers under Rule 144A can
be entities formed solely for the purpose of acquiring restricted
securities, so long as they satisfy the qualifying QIB tests.
Source: SEC Release
No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990).
How does a reseller
establish a reasonable belief that a person is a QIB?
The reseller (and any person acting on the
reseller’s behalf) may rely on the following, provided
the information is as of a date not more than 16 months (18
months for a foreign purchaser) preceding the sale :
- the purchaser's most recent publicly available annual
financial statements;
- information filed with (a) the SEC, another U.S. federal,
state, or local governmental agency, or a self-regulatory
organization or (b) a foreign governmental agency or foreign
self-regulatory organization;
- information in a recognized securities manual, such as
Moody's or Standard & Poor's; or
- a certification by the purchaser’s chief financial
or other executive officer specifying the amount of securities
owned and invested as of a date on, or since, the close
of the buyer’s most recent fiscal year.
This list is not exclusive. See more
@ Can a reseller of restricted securities rely
on information other than that enumerated in Rule 144A for its
belief that the prospective purchaser is a QIB?.
Source:
Rule
144A(d)(1)(i) - (iv) of the 1933 Act and SEC Release 33-6862
(April 23, 1990)
Can a reseller rely on the information
enumerated in Rule 144A even though more current information
shows that the level of securities owned by the prospective
purchaser is lower?
Yes. The SEC has expressly stated so. However,
a reseller cannot rely on certifications that it knows, or
is reckless in not knowing, are false.
Source: SEC
Release 33-6862 (April 23, 1990).
Can a reseller
of restricted securities rely on information other than that
enumerated in Rule 144A for its belief that the prospective
purchaser is a QIB?
Yes. The bases for reliance enumerated
in Rule 144A are non-exclusive; resellers may be able to establish
a reasonable belief of eligibility based on factors other
than those cited.
A reseller cannot rely on certifications that
it knows, or is reckless in not knowing, are false, but there
is no duty of verification. In other words, unless circumstances
give a reseller reason to question the veracity of the information
relied upon, the reseller does not have a duty of inquiry
to verify the information.
Source: Rule
144A(d)(1) of the 1933 Act and SEC Release No. 6862 (April
23, 1990).
C. Reseller's Reasonable Steps So Buyer is
Aware of Rule 144A Reliance
Why must the reseller take reasonable
steps to make the purchaser aware that it is relying on Rule
144A in connection with the resale?
The seller must make the purchaser aware that
it is acquiring restricted securities since those securities
may only be resold pursuant to an exemption or registration
under the 1933 Act.
Source: Marvin
E. Pollack, Resales of Restricted Securities Under SEC Rules
144 and 144A, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (1997).
How does the reseller typically
satisfy the requirement of making the buyer aware that the
reseller may rely on Rule 144A in connection with the resale?
By a legend on the security itself, a statement
in the private placement memorandum or other offering document,
and a restricted CUSIP number.
The note or stock certificate representing the
securities resold under Rule 144A will generally include a
legend (or a notation for electronic records) stating that
the securities have not been registered under the 1933 Act
and, therefore, may not be resold or otherwise disposed of
in the absence of such registration or unless such transaction
is exempt from, or not subject to, registration.
In addition, the offering memorandum used in
connection with the Rule 144A offering typically will state
that:
"Each purchaser of the securities will
be deemed to have represented and agreed that it is acquiring
the securities for its own account or for an account with
respect to which it exercises sole investment discretion,
and that it or such account is a QIB and is aware that the
sale is being made to it in reliance on Rule 144A."
The offering memorandum will also state that
the purchaser understands and agrees that the securities to
be acquired must be reoffered and resold pursuant to an exemption
or registration under the 1933 Act. The
security will also be given a restricted CUSIP number.
D. Eligible Securities
When are securities deemed to be
of the "same class" as securities listed on a U.S. national
securities exchange or quoted on an automated inter-dealer
quotation system?
If the securities are substantially identical.
Common stock is deemed to be of the “same
class” if it is of substantially similar character and
the holders enjoy substantially similar rights and privileges.
See more @ Can a reseller rely on Rule 144A
to reoffer or resell securities underlying ADRs? and What
happens if a security that was previously resold pursuant
to Rule 144A is subsequently listed on a U.S. stock exchange
or quoted on a U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation system?
Preferred stock will be deemed to be of the
same class if its terms relating to dividend rate, liquidation
preference, voting rights, convertibility, call, redemption
and other similar material matters are substantially identical.
Debt securities will be deemed to be of the
same class if the terms relating to interest rate, maturity,
subordination, convertibility, call, redemption, and the like
are substantially the same.
In addition, a convertible or exchangeable security
with an effective conversion premium on issuance (which means
at pricing) of less than 10%, and a warrant with a term less
than three years or an effective exercise premium on issuance
(which means at pricing) of less than 10%, will be treated
as the “same class” as the underlying security.
See more @ How is an effective conversion premium
calculated?.
Source: Rule
144A(d)(3)(i) and SEC Release No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990).
Rule 144A(d)(3)(i) “invites a comparison of apparently
different types of securities of the same issuer to determine
whether in reality they should be considered the same class.”
J. William Hicks, Resales of Restricted Securities at 7-29
(West Group 1999). The SEC has stated that privately-placed
securities that, at the time of issuance, were fungible with
securities trading on a U.S. exchange or quoted in Nasdaq
would not be eligible for resale under Rule 144A. In Release
No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990), the SEC stated that the test
under Rule 144A to determine whether common stock will be
deemed to be of the same class is the same as the test used
under Section
12(g)(5) of the 1934 Act and will be interpreted by the
SEC in the same manner.
How is an effective
conversion premium calculated?
For a convertible security, by (a) taking
its price at issuance, (b) subtracting from such price the
aggregate market value of the securities that would be received
on conversion, and (c) dividing the difference by the amount
subtracted in (b).
For a warrant, by (a) taking its price
at issuance, (b) adding to such price its aggregate exercise
price, (c) subtracting from such number the aggregate market
value of the securities that would be received on exercise,
and (d) dividing the difference by the amount subtracted in
(c).
For both of these calculations, the market
value of the underlying securities is determined as of the
day of pricing of the convertible security or warrant.
Source: Marvin
E. Pollack, Resales of Restricted Securities Under SEC Rules
144 and 144A, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (1997).
Notes 25 and 26 of SEC Release No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990)
provide examples on how to calculate the effective conversion
premium and effective exercise premium.
Are restricted securities received
upon conversion eligible for resale even though they are the
same class as securities listed on a national securities exchange
or quoted in an automated inter-dealer quotation system?
Yes, but only if no additional consideration
is paid by the holder in connection with such conversion.
Thus, restricted securities received, without payment of additional
consideration by the holder, upon conversion where the convertible
securities are eligible for resale under Rule 144A may be
resold in reliance on Rule 144A.
Source: SEC No-Action
Letter Debevoise & Plimpton (available July 23, 1990).
Can a reseller
rely on Rule 144A to reoffer or resell securities underlying
ADRs?
No. If American Depositary Receipts are
listed on a U.S. national securities exchange or quoted on
an automated inter-dealer quotation system, the deposited
securities underlying the ADRs would also be considered publicly
traded, and thus may not be resold in reliance on Rule 144A.
Source: SEC Release
No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990).
What happens
if a security that was previously resold pursuant to Rule
144A is subsequently listed on a U.S. stock exchange or quoted
on a U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation system?
There is no effect on the eligibility
of previously issued Rule 144A securities.
Because eligibility under Rule 144A is determined
at the time of issuance, securities of the same class that
thereafter are listed on a U.S. national securities exchange
or a U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation system will not
affect the eligibility of the securities under Rule 144A.
Source: In SEC Release No. 33-6839 (July 19,
1989), the SEC stated that “eligibility for resale [under
Rule 144A] would be determined at the time of issuance in
interest of certainty.” See also SEC No-Action Letter
Shearman & Sterling (December 21, 1998).
What is the definition
of U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation systems for purposes
of Rule 144A?
Only securities quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market and the Nasdaq Small Cap Market are deemed to be “quoted
on a U.S. automated inter-dealer system” for purposes
of Rule 144A. As a result, securities quoted in these systems
cannot be resold under Rule 144A.
Securities quoted on the Nasdaq Electronic Bulletin
Board or in the Pink Sheets can be resold under Rule 144A.
Source: SEC Release No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990),
note 22. See also Telephone Interpretation No. 72 relating
to Rule 144 and No. 54 relating to Form S-3 of the Division
of Corporation Finance’s Manual
of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations.
E. Informational Requirements
What type of information is required
to be delivered to purchasers under Rule 144A?
At a minimum, the offering memorandum, which
must be reasonably current –(see more @
What does “reasonably current” information mean
in connection with furnishing disclosure to purchasers?
) should include:
- a brief description of the issuer's business, products
and services;
- the issuer's most recent balance sheet, profit and loss
statement, and retained earnings statement, audited, if
available; and
- similar financial statements for the two preceding fiscal
years.
However, because the antifraud provisions
of the securities laws apply to Rule 144A transactions, a Rule
144A offering memorandum typically contains disclosure comparable
to what a prospectus in a registered offering contains. See
more @ Are the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws applicable to Rule 144A transactions?
This delivery obligation can continue for some
time. See more @ When does the obligation to
provide a buyer with the information cease? .
Source: Rule
144A(d)(4)(i) of the 1933 Act.
What does "reasonably
current" information mean in connection with furnishing disclosure
to purchasers?
To be reasonably current:
- the business description must be as of a date within 12
months prior to the resale;
- the most recent balance sheet must be as of a date within
16 months prior to the resale; and
- the most recent profit and loss and retained earnings
statements must be for the 12 months preceding the date
of the balance sheet.
For a foreign issuer, if the required
information meets the timing requirements of its home country
or principal trading market, such information will be presumed
to be reasonably current. See more @ What type
of information needs to be provided by a 1934 Act reporting
company or a foreign issuer providing home country information?
.
Source:
Rule
144A(d)(4)(ii) of the 1933 Act.
How is the purchaser's "right to
obtain" such information from the issuer enforced?
It varies. Rule 144A does not specify
the manner by which the right to obtain such information would
arise.
Typically, the obligation to furnish this
information will be imposed by either:
- the terms of the security;
- a purchase agreement between the issuer and the initial
purchasers of the restricted securities; or
- a representation or undertaking in the offering memorandum.
What type
of information needs to be provided by a 1934 Act reporting
company or a foreign issuer providing home country information?
Rule 144A does not provide any specific
requirements for these two scenarios.
However, as a matter of practice, because the antifraud rules
apply to Rule 144A transactions, an offering memorandum containing
the information comparable to what a prospectus would contain
is a necessity. See more @ Are the antifraud
provisions of the federal securities laws applicable to Rule
144A transactions?
When does the obligation
to provide a buyer with the information cease?
The obligation to provide information continues
so long as the issuer is neither a reporting company nor a
foreign issuer providing home country information.
What information is required to be provided
to a buyer when a Rule 144A issuer's securities are guaranteed
by its parent company?
It depends on the status of the parent-guarantor.
The information requirement does not apply
if the securities are guaranteed by a parent company that
would itself be exempt from the information requirement. If
the parent-guarantor is not exempt, the information to be
supplied is that of the parent-guarantor.
Source: The staff's
position comes from the SEC No-Action Letters British Aerospace
(available May 9, 1990) and Schering-Plough Corp (available
November 21, 1991).
F. Rule 144A Trading Markets
Is there a trading market for Rule
144A securities?
Yes. Rule 144A securities may be traded
on the Nasdaq's screen-based automated trading system known
as PORTAL, "Private Offerings, Resale and Trading through
Automated Linkages."
In practice, even though many underwriters
require that Rule 144A securities be eligible to trade in
PORTAL, few securities are actually traded through it.
PORTAL was created for use in secondary
trading of unregistered securities in transactions exempt
from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements
of the 1933 Act pursuant to Rule 144A, and for primary placement
of Rule 144A securities.
PORTAL is intended to be a closed trading
market that limits trading to qualified institutions and established
depositary and clearance systems so that trades can only be
made to other such institutions, or outside the United States,
or pursuant to a registration statement or exemption from
registration. See more @ Who qualifies as a
buyer on the PORTAL market?
Source: SEC Release No. 34-27956 (April 27,
1990). The Rule 5300 series of the NASD
Manual contains the regulations relating to the PORTAL
market.
Who qualifies as
a buyer on the PORTAL market?
Only qualified institutional buyers (see
more @ What is a “QIB?”), dealers
who are qualified institutional buyers, and certain NASD registered
broker-dealers.
Anyone interested and eligible to use PORTAL
must first register with PORTAL and demonstrate their credentials.
See more @ How do securities become eligible to trade on the
PORTAL market?
Source: See Rules 5338, 5339 and 5351 of the
NASD
Manual.
How do securities
become eligible to trade on the PORTAL market?
First, an application must be made by
a PORTAL participant (with or without the issuer’s consent),
to determine if a security is eligible for deposit into the
PORTAL depositary system.
As part of this process, the security must be
deposited by the issuer or a PORTAL participant. The deposited
security must be in a negotiable form not subject to any restriction
that would impose an unreasonable burden on any PORTAL participant.
Source: See Rules 5321 and 5322 of the NASD
Manual.
G. Conducting Rule 144A Transactions
How are Rule 144A transactions structured?
Typically, an issuer first sells restricted
securities to a broker-dealer in a private placement conducted
pursuant to Section
4(2) or Regulation
D of the 1933 Act.
The broker-dealer then reoffers and resells
the securities to QIBs pursuant to the exemption provided
by Rule 144A. See more @ What are the conditions
that a reseller of restricted securities must satisfy to rely
on Rule 144A?
Rule 144A permits the broker-dealer to immediately
reoffer and resell the restricted securities, irrespective
of the fact that it has purchased the securities with a view
to the distribution of such securities. This is because the
availability of Rule 144A does not depend on how much time
has expired since the securities were issued or on whether
the reseller had an investment intent when it purchased the
securities.
The resales under Rule 144A are completely divorced
from the issuer’s original offering—no matter
how soon they occur or how inconsistent they are with the
issuer’s exemption. In this regard, Rule 144A states
that resales “shall be deemed not to affect the availability
of any exemption or safe harbor relating to any previous or
subsequent offer or sale of such securities by the issuer.”
Source: Preliminary Note No. 7 to Rule
144A of the 1933 Act and Rule 144A(e) of the 1933 Act.
See also C. Steven Bradford, Expanding the Non-Transactional
Revolution: A New Approach to Securities Regulation Exemptions,
49 Emory L.J. 437, 460 (Spring 2000).
What type of documentation
is typically involved in a Rule 144A transaction?
The documentation used in a Rule 144A
transaction is similar to that used in registered offerings,
including:
- an offering memorandum;
- a purchase agreement (between the issuer and the initial
purchasers (i.e., broker-dealer));
- a registration rights agreement (between the issuer and
the initial purchasers);
- legal opinions; and
- comfort letters.
Note: A registration rights agreement
would only be applicable to Rule 144A transactions in which
the issuer has agreed to register under the 1933 Act the securities
resold in the Rule 144A transaction. For a discussion of the
manner in which Rule 144A securities are registered under the
1933 Act, see more @ How are Rule 144A securities
registered under the 1933 Act? What
is the offering process in connection with a Rule 144A transaction?
Generally, the Rule 144A offering process
mimics the public offering process. The features of this process
include:
- solicitation of orders using a "red herring"
or preliminary offering memorandum;
- confirmation of orders using a final offering
memorandum;
- execution of purchase agreement at pricing;
- delivery of comfort letter from accountants
at pricing;
- delivery of legal opinions and other closing
documents at closing; and
- closing three to five days after pricing.
See more @ What type of documentation
is typically involved in a Rule 144A transaction?
Why do Rule 144A purchasers typically
insist that the issuer register the securities issued in the
Rule 144A transaction?
Liquidity is the primary benefit that
comes from holding freely tradable securities versus restricted
securities. See more @ Are securities resold
under Rule 144A freely tradable after such resale?
In addition, certain state and federal laws
prohibit mutual funds and insurance companies from investing
more than a certain percentage of their assets in restricted
securities. Thus, absent an issuer’s agreement to register
Rule 144A securities, these entities would be severely limited
in their ability to purchase securities in Rule 144A transactions.
Source: SEC No-Action Letter Morgan Stanley
& Co. Incorporated (available June 5, 1991) and Marvin
E. Pollack, Resales of Restricted Securities Under SEC Rules
144 and 144A, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (1997).
How are Rule 144A
securities registered under the 1933 Act?
The two principal methods to register
Rule 144A securities under the 1933 Act are:
Source: SEC No-Action
Letters Exxon Capital Holding Corp. (available May 13, 1988);
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (available June 5, 1991);
K-III Communications Corporation (available May 14, 1993); Shearman
& Sterling (available July 2, 1993). The Morgan Stanley & Co.
no-action letter contains an excellent discussion of the advantages
of an Exxon Capital exchange offer over shelf registrations.
Stanley Keller, Current Issues in Private Placements: The Metaphysics
of Integration of Private and Public Offerings, 32nd Annual
Institute on Securities Regulation (Practising Law Institute
2000). What
is an Exxon Capital exchange offering?
A procedure under which securities are privately
placed pursuant to Rule 144A and then promptly exchanged for
similar securities that have been registered under the 1933
Act. This is the preferred means for providing holders of
Rule 144A securities with freely tradable securities.
From the issuer’s standpoint, an Exxon
Capital exchange offer eliminates the need to continuously
update a shelf registration statement over its lifetime, which
may be as long as two years. However, these exchange offers
are currently permissible only with respect to non-convertible
debt securities and investment grade preferred stock.
The SEC has indicated that it is unlikely to
expand its no-action letter position beyond its current parameters.
Affiliates of the issuer may not participate in an Exxon Capital
exchange offer and the SEC takes the position that broker-dealers
also may not participate in these exchange offers.
In addition, all exchanging holders will be
required to represent that they acquired the securities in
the ordinary course of their business and have no arrangements
or understandings with respect to the distribution of the
security that is the subject of the exchange offer.
Although an Exxon Capital exchange offer alleviates
the administrative headache of shelf registrations, it is
not possible to use an Exxon Capital exchange offer if the
Rule 144A securities are not non-convertible debt securities
or investment grade preferred stock. See more @
Why are shelf offerings not the preferable form of registering
Rule 144Aofferings?.
Source: The SEC staff’s positions in this
area come from a series of no-action letters: Exxon Capital
Holding Corp. (available May 13, 1988); Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated (available June 5, 1991); K-III Communications
Corporation (available May 14, 1993); and Shearman & Sterling
(available July 2, 1993). The Morgan Stanley & Co. no-action
letter contains an excellent discussion of the advantages
of an Exxon Capital exchange offer over shelf registrations.
Stanley Keller, Current Issues in Private Placements: The
Metaphysics of Integration of Private and Public Offerings,
32nd Annual Institute on Securities Regulation (Practicing
Law Institute 2000).
How are Rule 144A
securities registered in a shelf offering?
Pursuant to Rule
415(a)(1)(i), issuers of Rule 144A securities may register
the resale of the restricted securities that were sold in
the Rule 144A transaction. Registered offerings pursuant to
Rule 415 are known as shelf registrations.
Rule
415 of the 1933 Act permits offerings that are not intended
to be offered within a short period of time after effectiveness.
In particular, Rule 415(a)(1)(i) permits either a delayed
or continuous offering of securities “which are to be
offered or sold solely by or on behalf of a person or persons
other than the registrant . . . .” The persons covered
by this rule would include resellers holding Rule 144A securities.
Although shelf registrations offer potential
liquidity to buyers of Rule 144A securities, such securities
remain restricted until they are resold pursuant to the shelf
registration statement. In shelf registrations, the issuer
should covenant to keep the shelf registration statement continuously
effective for no less than one year and preferably for two
years in order to ensure the holder liquidity until the resale
exemption under Rule
144 becomes available (i.e., the one-year holding period
under Rule 144(d)(1) (with volume and other restrictions applicable
to the resale) or the two-year holding period under Rule 144(k)
(without limitation as to volume and other restrictions applicable
to the resale)).
Why are shelf offerings
not the preferable form of registering Rule 144A offerings?
If Rule 144A securities are transferable
via book-entry form at The Depository Trust Company (known
as DTC), preparation of shelf registration statements can
be an administrative headache.
The SEC requires that the prospectus contain
a list of the beneficial owners of the restricted securities
that will be resold pursuant to the shelf registration statement.
However, when securities are uncertificated, it is virtually
impossible to identify the beneficial owner of the security
for whom the registered holder (i.e., CEDE & Co.) holds
the securities before such beneficial owner has transferred
the security.
As a result, an issuer will typically require
that holders of the Rule 144A securities notify it regarding
the distribution of the securities, and that new holders of
the securities furnish it with a notice and questionnaire
before such holders can be added to the registration statement.
Due to these administrative issues, Exxon
Capital exchange offers are the preferred means for providing
holders of Rule 144A securities with freely tradable securities.
See more @ What is an Exxon Capital exchange
offering?
What is a "side-by-side" offering
in the context of Rule 144A?
Conducting simultaneous offerings relying
on different exemptions or safe harbors from the registration
requirements of the 1933 Act.
This normally involves the concurrent solicitation
of:
H. Use of the Internet to Conduct Rule 144A
offerings
Can the Internet be used to make
Rule 144A reoffers and resales?
It is possible, but it is unclear how it can
be safely accomplished.
Because it is unclear whether general solicitation
is prohibited in Rule 144A transactions, it is advisable to
follow the procedure set forth in the SEC No-Action Letter
IPONet (available July 26, 1996) when using the Internet to
conduct a Rule 144A offering. See more @ Private
Offerings.
Following IPONet, a password-restricted web
page permitting access to the Rule 144A offering should become
available to a prospective investor only after it has been
determined that the investor is a QIB within the meaning of
Rule 144A.
Note that the SEC staff has not yet specifically
addressed Rule 144A offerings in the Internet context. See
more @ May an issuer publish a notice about
a proposed Rule 144A transaction?
Source: “Rule 144A does not expressly
limit the manner of offering or selling eligible securities.
But informal comments by a member of the SEC staff indicate
that a person may not rely on Rule 144A if it directly or
indirectly engages in general solicitation.” J. William
Hicks, Resales of Restricted Securities at 7-54 (West Group
1999).
I. Miscellaneous
Are the antifraud
provisions of the federal securities laws applicable to Rule
144A transactions?
Yes. Rule 144A specifically states that
the safe harbor provided by the rule relates solely to the
application of Section
5 of the 1933 Act and not to the antifraud provisions.
As a result, because the antifraud provisions
apply to Rule 144A transactions, an offering memorandum containing
the information comparable to what a prospectus would contain
is advisable in any Rule 144A transaction.
Source: Preliminary Note No. 1 of Rule
144A of the 1933 Act states that “[t]his section
relates solely to the application of Section 5 of the Act
and not to antifraud or other provisions of the federal securities
laws.”
Is a Rule 144A security a "covered
security" for purposes of Section 18 of the 1933 Act?
Maybe. Section
18 of the 1933 Act contains two provisions that may exempt
Rule 144A transactions from state regulation. Section 18 exempts
certain securities and securities offerings from state regulation
relating to registration or qualification of securities, or
registration or qualification of securities transactions.
However, states may continue to require notice filings to
be made with the state in connection with such securities
offerings.
First, Section
18 will exempt Rule 144A transactions from state regulation
if (i) the issuer of the securities being resold in the Rule
144A transaction has a class of securities traded on the New
York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq
Market System and (ii) the securities being resold in the
Rule 144A transaction are equal or senior in seniority to
the issuer’s securities that are listed on one of the
above-referenced markets.
Second, Section 18 will exempt Rule 144A resales
to a “qualified purchaser” from state regulation.
In December 2001, the SEC issued a proposed
rule to define the term “qualified purchaser”
under Section 18 of the 1933 Act. The proposed definition
mirrors the definition of “accredited investor”
under the 1933 Act. Unfortunately, the SEC has not yet adopted
its proposed definition of a “qualified purchaser”
for purposes of Section 18. Thus, most legal practitioners
are reluctant to advise their clients that they may rely on
this proposed definition or, consequently, this provision
of Section 18 of the 1933 Act.
If Section 18 of the 1933 Act does not exempt
the Rule 144A transaction from state regulation, then such
transaction will be required to be registered with each state
in which the Rule 144A resales occur or must otherwise be
exempt from such state registration.
Most states’ securities laws contain an
exemption from registration for reoffers and resales made
to QIBs within the meaning of Rule 144A. In states that do
not have such an exemption, Rule 144A sales are often exempt
because Rule 144A purchasers would likely be deemed to be
an “institutional investor” for purposes of such
states’ institutional investor exemption.
Source: Preliminary Note No. 5 of Rule
144A and SEC Release No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990) state
that nothing in Rule 144A removes the need to comply with
any applicable state law relating to the offer and sale of
securities. See Section
18(b)(1)(C) of the 1933 Act with respect to the nationally
traded exemption, and Section 18(b)(3) of the 1933 Act with
respect to the “qualified purchaser” exemption.
In Release
No. 33-8041 (Dec. 19, 2001), the SEC proposed a definition
of the term “qualified purchaser” that would mirror
the definition of “accredited investor” under
the 1933 Act..
Can an issuer that is not a 1934
Act reporting company be required to register under the 1934
Act in connection with a Rule 144A transaction?
Yes. Section
12(g) of the 1934 Act requires any issuer having 500 or
more holders of record of a class of equity securities and
more than $10 million in assets at the end of its most recent
fiscal year to register the class of equity securities under
the 1934 Act.
As a result, a non-reporting company that has
sold equity securities to 500 or more QIBs in connection with
a Rule 144A transaction may be required to register such class
of equity security under the 1934 Act.
Source: Preliminary Note No. 4 of Rule
144A and SEC Release No. 33-6862 (April 23, 1990) state
that Rule 144A does not affect the securities registration
requirements of Section
12 of the 1934 Act.
Are securities resold in reliance on Rule
144A included in determining the amount of securities that
a person can resell in reliance on Rule 144?
No. Securities resold in reliance on Rule 144A
need not be included in determining the amount of securities
resold in reliance on Rule 144.
Source: Rule
144(e)(3)(vii) of the 1933 Act and SEC Release No. 33-6806
(October 25, 1988).
May an issuer publish
a notice about a proposed Rule 144A transaction?
Yes. An offering pursuant to Rule 144A
is an unregistered offering within the meaning of Rule
135c of the 1933 Act. An issuer that is subject to the
reporting requirements of the 1934 Act or that is exempt from
such reporting requirements under Rule
12g3-2(b) is entitled to rely on Rule 135c to publish
a notice that it proposes to make, is making or has made an
offering of securities pursuant to a Rule 144A transaction.
Note: Rule 135c of the 1933 Act permits
the notice to take the form of a news release but requires
that any such notice be filed with the SEC under cover of
Form
8-K.
|